Steingarts Kritik: Politiker ohne Staatskunst – Ein Kommentar
So, Steingart’s latest rant about the lack of Staatskunst among today's politicians – man, did that hit a nerve! I mean, I've been following his commentary for years, and this one felt particularly… pointed. He wasn't just criticizing individual politicians; he was questioning the entire system, the whole political landscape, if you will. And honestly? He’s got a point.
My Own "Staatskunst" Fail (or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Process)
Remember that disastrous local council meeting I went to last year? I'd prepared meticulously – facts, figures, everything. I thought I had a solid argument against that proposed shopping mall development. I even practiced my speech in front of the mirror! But when I actually got there… bam. Completely thrown. The councillors, they weren't interested in facts. They were interested in… politics. The backroom deals, the promises made, the unspoken alliances. It was a masterclass in something… not Staatskunst. It felt like watching a group of highly skilled, yet utterly ineffective, players engage in a game with no rules.
It felt like watching a bad play. A terrible, drawn-out, and frustrating play.
It really drove home Steingart's point: you can have all the knowledge in the world, all the Sachverstand, but without the political acumen, the skill to navigate the complexities of power dynamics, you're essentially useless. I felt like a total idiot. My meticulously researched presentation? Pretty much ignored. I left feeling like I'd wasted my time – and probably everyone else's.
What is Staatskunst, Anyway? And How Do We Get More of It?
Steingart's argument, if I understand it correctly, is that Staatskunst is more than just policy-making. It's about leadership, vision, and the ability to unite people towards a common goal. It's about strategic thinking, long-term planning, and the courage to make difficult decisions, even when unpopular. It's the art of governing; the skill of building consensus and navigating complex challenges. Think Bismarck, or maybe even a less controversial figure – someone who expertly navigated political currents, successfully building alliances and maintaining a level of national stability.
It’s not just about having good ideas. It’s about executing those ideas. It's about understanding the nuances of political compromise, building consensus, and inspiring confidence in your ability to lead. It’s about pragmatism, but also about sticking to your principles when necessary. It’s the ability to think strategically, weighing the long-term benefits of decisions, even if they might create short-term political pain.
Practical Tips for Aspiring "Staatskünstler" (or, How to Not Be a Total Failure Like Me)
So, what can we, mere mortals, learn from Steingart's critique and my own embarrassing failure? A few things, I reckon:
- Network, network, network: Building relationships is crucial. You need allies, not just enemies.
- Understand the players: Know who holds the power, what their motivations are, and how they operate. This doesn't require shady deals but thorough knowledge of political actors.
- Master the art of compromise: Rarely will you get everything you want. Learn to negotiate effectively.
- Communicate clearly and effectively: Your message needs to resonate. Mastering public speaking and written communication is key.
- Be prepared, but be flexible: Things rarely go according to plan. Be adaptable and responsive.
The Bottom Line (and a Plea for Better Politics)
Steingart’s criticism is a call to action. We need politicians who are more than just skilled debaters; we need leaders with Staatskunst – the vision, the skill, and the courage to guide us towards a better future. And maybe, just maybe, if we all do our part – by getting involved, by holding our leaders accountable, and by demanding better – we can start to see a real change. One can hope, at least. It’s going to take a lot of work, that's for sure. And maybe a few less disastrous council meetings for me personally.